Blackbeard Blog

This is a blog by Tom Ewing about the intersection of social media and market research. I work for Kantar Operations in this area: everything on this blog is my own personal viewpoint, rather than the view of Kantar Operations, Kantar or any affiliated company. Here is an good place to start if you're interested in what I think about all this stuff. Contact me at Tom.Ewing@kantaroperations.com, or via @tomewing on Twitter.
Feb 08
Permalink
“You can’t trust anyone nowadays”, sung The Chameleons once, and it seems to be true. But the highlit statistic on this graph - from the Edelman Trust Barometer - is a little odd: EVERYTHING has collapsed in trust on the graph between 2008 and 2010, and the ranking of these things is still exactly the same. So why do Ad Age single out “people don’t trust social media”?
To be honest my first reaction to this chart would be “Your sample’s f*cked.” My second reaction would be to ask if anything had happened between 2008 and 2010 which would make the very concept of “credible sources of information about a company” less, er, credible. And of course yes, maybe such a thing did happen. To be fair Ad Age mention this, in the context of the overall decline, but after that it’s back to bashing a ‘social media myth’ which the old data didn’t prove and which the new data doesn’t disprove.

“You can’t trust anyone nowadays”, sung The Chameleons once, and it seems to be true. But the highlit statistic on this graph - from the Edelman Trust Barometer - is a little odd: EVERYTHING has collapsed in trust on the graph between 2008 and 2010, and the ranking of these things is still exactly the same. So why do Ad Age single out “people don’t trust social media”?

To be honest my first reaction to this chart would be “Your sample’s f*cked.” My second reaction would be to ask if anything had happened between 2008 and 2010 which would make the very concept of “credible sources of information about a company” less, er, credible. And of course yes, maybe such a thing did happen. To be fair Ad Age mention this, in the context of the overall decline, but after that it’s back to bashing a ‘social media myth’ which the old data didn’t prove and which the new data doesn’t disprove.

Comments (View)
Feb 05
Permalink
Comments (View)
Feb 04
Permalink
Comments (View)
Permalink
Comments (View)
Jan 28
Permalink

Out of control

This brand republic article makes an old claim that’s - still - a bold claim: “brands have lost control of their identity and they will never get it back”.

I’ve heard that a lot, it might be true: my brief experience with brand identity leads me to believe they’ve never had much but I think now that yes, they probably have even less.

But you also have to ask what this idea of ‘control’ means anyway, and where it went. There’s a ready answer to that: YOU control brands now! You the public! You the consumer! You the “influential”!

Read More

Comments (View)
Jan 18
Permalink

I must move fast, you will not miss me

Amazed and flattered that my post about hearing younger researchers’ voices in Market Research attracted so much attention - especially as it was posted at close to pub o’clock on a Friday night! I’ve replied to all the comments on the original post - all worth reading and posing intriguing questions.

There were also a couple of blog posts related to mine - this from Kelpenhagen which was written in parallel with it, and this from a new blog, the Research Geek. Both are worth reading, both are basically making the same point but from different angles. As Kelpenhagen says, a lot of younger researchers - and a lot of older ones - aren’t especially bothered about the “future of research”. They turn up and do the work, get the paycheck and go out and enjoy themselves.

Read More

Comments (View)
Jan 15
Permalink

Are The Kids Alright?

I was chatting to Katie Harris and Ray Poynter yesterday and Ray raised an interesting question. There’s a lot of talk about the future of research right now: a general sense that the industry is at a crossroads, even if people disagree on what the different signposts point to. But what’s noticeable is that most of the people talking about this stuff are, frankly, not the future of research. They’re its present, people who’ve been in the industry for a decade or two, conference veterans, agency CEOs. Nothing wrong with that - these are exactly the people we want to be pushing the industry forward. But as Ray pointed out, there’s a lack of younger voices in these conversations. Not a total lack - I did say “most” - but a lack nonetheless.

Why might that be? Here are some back of an envelope ideas, though I’d love to hear your suggestions:

Read More

Comments (View)
Jan 08
Permalink

A Story About Listening

The other day I decided I wanted to do some research, so I went to a bar. In the bar were lots of consumers! They were in their natural environment, giving unprompted opinions: all I had to do was listen.

I excitedly sat down at the bar between a young man and a couple. Here was where I would do my listening.

First of all I listened to the couple: the man was talking to the woman. “I’m not seeing anyone right now,” he said.

Then I listened to the young man next to me, who was talking to the barman. “Yes, I’m 21” he was saying.

Now, is this or is this not research gold! Here were ordinary consumers, in their natural environment, giving away demographic information on their age and marital status. No more need for boring surveys, I thought! You can get everything you want - just by listening.

The moral of this story: in 2010, I’d like to see just as much work done on the context of social media “found data” as its content.

Comments (View)
Jan 06
Permalink
Looking for a new way to generate buzz for the brand, Unilever created an innovative, entertaining brand experience that compelled consumers to spread the word through viral-marketing efforts.

That sentence followed this sentence, “Consider Unilever. Its new-media initiative for I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter! features Spraychel—the brand’s animated mascot—and her adventures in the fridge.” We’re really talking about an animated butter alternative mascot and using the words “innovative” and “entertaining”? Oh, and by the way, apparently that’s Spraychel like spray + Raychel. And she’s running for president. Ugh.

And then the next sentence in the article says, “Weekly webisodes and a ‘celebrity-esque’ blog allow consumers to follow the storylines and deliver the latest gossip in the fridge.” Wow, it gets better. The latest gossip in the fridge.

And then I stopped reading the article. Sometimes I hate the marketing industry.

How Brands Are Becoming the Media (and Why Your Brand Should Probably Do the Same) : MarketingProfs

(via heyitsnoah)

I have nothing to add to this except total agreement really.

Comments (View)
Jan 05
Permalink

“I continue to grow at a nice clip — I have over 75k followers, but I’ve noticed that clickthrough on my links has actually *dropped* quite a bit.

I suspect that the average # of people an individual is following has gone up dramatically and therefore any one tweet scrolls away much more rapidly. Combine that with that many more links being tweeted. And then move a huge number of those followers onto iPhone clients where clickthroughs on links are much lower.”

— from this comment on a very interesting Anil Dash post. This makes a good deal of intuitive sense.
Comments (View)